 |
|
 |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Do you believe in life after death? |
Yes |
|
44% |
[ 20 ] |
No |
|
55% |
[ 25 ] |
|
Total Votes : 45 |
|
Author |
Topic : "Life after death exist?" |
Matthew member
Member # Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 3784 Location: I am out of here for good
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:11 am |
|
 |
This Thread is getting more and more interesting, cool thoughts there Sumaleth.
I saw some program yesterday on discovery where they had mapped all of the DNA and genes from a fly and apparently we had much in common with the fly. I guess everything on earth is created on one building stone, one cell and that is so interesting.
According to sceintists the Universe is expanding as we speak and that there is no ending to it, or maybe according to them the effect could be reversed so somewhere or sometime the Universe starts to implode.
btw, I am having a hard time to believe in the moon landing, so many strange things about those photos, maan, I would give a billion to find out the truth and not to see star-less photos from an interior studio somewhere in the states. with a flag that should point straight up and not straight to the side...huuu Cough,.....Cough....Hoax....Cough.
Anyway, enough of hoax conspiracy�s.
Something that is interesting with this topic is that the question was if there is an afterlife and all of sudden everyone was talking about religion and the bible. Could be the resurrection of Jesus and that started the commotion, I mean who many in the states believed in UFO�s before the Movie "Close Encounter�s of the third grade" (hmm I Don�t know the actual title in English).
I have had a weird theory for very long, it is if Humans or something else lived on the big planet before Big Bang, What if there were a big planet and that there was a civilisation even then.
The cool thing with evolution is that we have something in common with everything, the rock, the tree, the birds, the fly�s, remember that when exit your door tomorrow.
Matthew |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 10:43 am |
|
 |
There's no stars in the footage because if you set the camera exposure long enough to get the stars the rest of the image would be pure white.
The flag sits straight out because they had a bar in the top of the flag so that it would sit up.
"Close Encounter�s of the third grade" is the kiss I had with Karen Spalding behind the primary school canteen.
(it's 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' in english)
The universe is expanding, and current calculations suggest that there's not enough matter in the universe to slow the expansion down. So unless they find some more types of matter hidden somewhere (possible), the universe will continue to expand, eventually losing all it's heat, and we'll end up with a very dead universe.
That's quite a way off yet though.
The expansion isn't happening like you might think. There's not an "edge" to the universe moving outwards. The universe has no edge, it's kinda like the surface of a balloon except in 3 dimensions.
It's hard to imagine because there's nothing we experience in our everyday lives that matches it.
And it's actually the "space" itself that is expanding. The space between earth and the sun is expanding. The space between our solar system and the next solar system is getting larger. The space between the atoms of your thumbnail is expanding. It's a very fun kind of expansion.
Quote: |
The cool thing with evolution is that we have something in common with everything, the rock, the tree, the birds, the fly�s, remember that when exit your door tomorrow.
|
Darwinian Evolution actually only deals with "life", not stuff like rocks. We don't share too much with rocks
Although we are all made of star dust. The big bang created only the lighter elements, like Hydrogen, and it's only through the life cycle of stars that the heavier elements are created, like oxygen and carbon. _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials |
|
Back to top |
|
Matthew member
Member # Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 3784 Location: I am out of here for good
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 11:16 am |
|
 |
aha Karen Spalding. hehe, so is that a term for kissing and stuff?
btw, thank you for the correction, my English sucks when it comes to translate Movie titles...hehe
N�rkontakt av tredje graden - is the swedish translation of the movie title.
I think I read somewhere that stones and stuff are actually in movement too as all the atoms are in the human body and other materials, should not be confused with genes I guess, but if there are movement, should maybe something be alive in there...or maybe not...hmm.
I see we share the same interest of Universal science, cool
I think that the Dark material in space is the expansion factor so I guess as you said there�s no ending to it.
Matthew |
|
Back to top |
|
glody member
Member # Joined: 02 Dec 2001 Posts: 233 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 12:45 pm |
|
 |
i know what happens, but i cant talk about it as i have signed an NDA.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
SolarC member
Member # Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 274 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:56 am |
|
 |
Sumaleth wrote: |
Quote: |
How I feel about the scientific viewpoint is that it can not ever answer all the basic questions about life. Even if big bang, evolution theory and the theories of quantum mechanics would've been all proven they couldn't really answer the question about the origin of life.
|
What is this belief based on? Let me guess - the position of the stars.  |
Hehehe, no not the stars.
This is a complex issue, but I'll try to explain it.
The way I see it western cognitive system makes us dependent of certain fixed ways of thinking. Our valuations are always based on some particular fixed thoughts, like for an example a conception of what is orthodox. I don't base my view of the world on this only one type anthropology.
I feel that science is like a big fishing net. It certainly catches fishes, but there might be things in the water that go through the holes of the fishing net. So for me spiritual practises are one way of trying to lurk in to the water if there would be something else to see as well.
Many people who are experimenting with alternate states of consciousness have had experiences that has changed their attitude towards life. This kind of experiences are one thing that has changed my view on life aswell. Experiencing different worlds, having experiences like ego loss or just seeing parts of the substructures of human psyche can be very broadening experiences.
Quote: |
But seriously, there's NO way anyone right now can guess what the limits of science are. The universe has proven to be amazingly systematic so far, there's no reason to expect to find limits yet. |
Not in this material world. But these things are mostly questions of if there is something byeond this universe. Science is tied into this material universe we live in. I'm not ofcourse saying that peoples faith could prove spiritual things as science proves things in material world.
Quote: |
Quote: |
People easily forget that evolution theory hasn't been proved and much less all the things explained basing arguments on it.
|
Maybe you haven't been keeping up on current events, but the evolutionary process is most definitely proven. It's observed happening under laboratory conditions every day. (it's the reason the AIDS virus is so potent, for example)
We see the effects of it on the news every week. Another species of animal is extinct? That's evolution. There was a baby born in Australia recently who had twelve fingers. That's evolution too.
There is evidence of evolution everywhere. |
You are now talking about the term evolution which I never questioned. I was talking about the evolution theory as basis of life. Evolution theory has not been proven as the way our universe developed and nothing in science is kept certain unless it is empiricly proved. So if you believe that our universe was born just because of evolution before it's proven, you are not basing your world view on objective science but on a belief. This is very common phenomenon that scientific theories give birth for beliefs. These beliefs that have started of some scientific theory are called pseudo sciences. Examples of this kind of pseudo sciences are grafology, frenology, homeopathy etc.
To avoid misunderstandings I do _believe_ myself that evolution theory is the most likely way our material world formed, based on current information, which yet is insufficient to give certainty to this theory. But evolution theory doesn't overrule any existance of things beyond our own universe.
One interesting thing to think about is our dreams. When we're dreaming we can't separate our dream world from the real world unless we practise it quite much. With practise we are able to become lucid and do whatever we like in our dreamworld. Which guarantee do we have that our so called real world would be any more real than our dreams or as a hypothesis what kind of evidence could we find about existance of the real world from dream world if we wouldn't know the real world to exist?
BTW,
www.lucidity.com - if people are interested in lucid dreaming |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 5:52 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
But these things are mostly questions of if there is something byeond this universe. Science is tied into this material universe we live in. I'm not ofcourse saying that peoples faith could prove spiritual things as science proves things in material world.
|
Ah yes, I think this is a good example of the reason the age old debate of science vs religion never, ever gets anywhere.
The "theist" version of God - that is, the religious version - is above science, meaning that god it not at all confined by what the limits of what science might be able to explain.
This means that religious people have an overriding belief that regardless of what science is able to work out, there will always be things that it simply does not have access to.
I guess this is a belief in an "irrational" universe. That the universe might appear rational to some degree, but the underlying system is not confined to rational behavior.
On the other hand, people who follow science have an overriding belief in a "rational" universe. They believe that because the universe - to date - has turned out to be remarkably systematic that it's highly likely that is ALL based on a system.
The scientists say things like: "Theism is based on a lot of irrational assumptions/beliefs."
Which is true. But of course theists don't believe that the universe is completely rational, so the scientist's argument is > /null/void.
--
My take is that the irrational side of the argument stems from the evolutionary process.
We like to think of ourselves as special because we have "freedom of choice". But the truth is that we don't really have FULL freedom of choice. The majority of our behavior is still controlled by instinct, and instinct is an artifact of evolution. And evolution is neither perfect nor necessarily "right" -- it's whatever we needed to survive another generation.
But I base that on rational thinking, which is of course pointless.  _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials |
|
Back to top |
|
Awetopsy member
Member # Joined: 04 Oct 2000 Posts: 3028 Location: Kelowna
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:25 am |
|
 |
Ive not stopped replying to this thread but delayed a bit because I wanted to think about my answer before replying too hastily. I hope those of you who have responded to me carefully read this instead of just skimming because I cover alot of ground here.
Quote: |
Why does the son of god need to identify with boneheads? |
Because he knew those boneheads would figure it outsomeday. Sometimes you need to speak at somebody elses level in order to help them understand the bigger picture.
Quote: |
So he pretends to be something he isn't to appeal to his bonehead desciples... or does he? And why? |
HE's not pretending anything. as above, he's speaking at their level to prove to them that everybody is equal. Like I said before, he uses the term "dog" because he knows they would identify with that, then in front of them acknowledges her as a woman to prove to them that she had just as much human right.
Gods original plan was to "save" the jews from sin and then get them reaching out to others outside their circle. Many times Jesus healed "gentiles" in front of his Jewish followers, to prove to them that this "gospel" was for everybody.
Quote: |
What about dinasaurs by the way? How does that fit into the world described by original hewbrew bible? |
Actually the bible makes mention of the time before our own history in the books of Ezekiel, Isiah and a couple others. But hopefully this will answer some of the bible vs. religion thing too.
Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth
Genesis 1:2 - and the Earth was void and without form and darkness was upon the face of the earth.
Science tells us that the earth is about 4 and 1/2 billion years old.. give or take a few years. Well the bible really doesnt argue this point. In fact the bible is just an acount of mankind, the way it is known now.
Going back to Genesis 1:1 - 2, if what the rest of the bible says about God is true, then God doesnt create anything that is "void and without form with darkness upon the face of the earth", because according to the rest of the bible "God is light, He creates perfect things. So something must have happened between verse 1 and 2 that made the face of the "earth void and without form with darkness upon the face of the deep."
Science offers one theory of dinosaurs extinction that states that some large space fairing object struck the earth causing massive land upheaval and water displacement effectively causing Nuclear Winter to settle over the planet.. possibly causing the earth to be "void and without form with darkness upon the face of the earth"
Science States that life started in the middle east, probably around the area where Iraq is.
Top bible scholars beleive the garden of eden was also in this area.
The bible DOES NOT say that the earth is only 5000 years old. There are scriptures which refer to times before our recorded history. So that leave about 4.45555 billion years for disnosaurs etc.
Science has discovered skeletons of creatures which strike a strong resemblance to human beings as we know them, and I believe recently discovered an in tact body encased in ice of a young woman who lived 10000 years ago... or something like that...
The Bible says in genesis 1:28 "God said unto them(Adam and Eve) be fruitful and multiply, and REplenish(repopulate) the earth..." At this time in scripture, God had already placed all the animals and trees and plants etc... so God wasnt telling them to replenish it with those things... He was referring to a previous social system on earth, a prehistoric man if you will. Scripture also referres to the time before history, in Ezekiel 28 with Referrences to the heirarchy in place before Lucifer fell from Heaven.
Which brings me to Drew's question of:
Quote: |
this discussion if we were just born with the truth. Why make things so dang complicated? |
well, If the bible is true and the story of Adam and Eve and the garden of eden really did exist, then Mankind originally was created with "the truth". But since the angel Lucifer fell from heaven and became the "father of lies"(Satan) He, Satan, had to throw confusion into the mix to make Adam and Eve second guess God. If he could plant seeds of doubt in the First man he could gain access to planting confusion in all mankind after that.
*Side note* Matthew, the bible does not say that Adam and Eve were created with Dragons Blood... and that has to be the first time Ive ever heard that.
So now to Sumaleth,
Quote: |
Let's assume for a second that god really did design humans. A decent effort, I would have to say, but for someone who is supposedly omnipotent he built in some seriously screwy design flaws.
Should I thank you for the asthma and hayfever that have made it impossible for me to live an enjoyable and comfortable life? Thanks for cancer, thanks for viruses, thanks for bloat. Thanks for giving us less than 50% free will (consider the problems -that- causes in our society). Thanks for letting them show Sports Night at 5:35 in-the-blessed AM! Thanks for making your "word" so completely clear that no two people agree 100% on what you're about, which has lead to more people being killed -in you name- than any other form of unnatural death.
No really, great job dude. Stellar effort. |
Well, again, if the bible is true and Adam and Eve did eat the fruit of the tree, then it was this sin (transgression agains the set rules) that allowed seeds of doubt etc to enter the minds and hearts of mankind. If the Bible is true, then God doesnt create bad things, but allows bad things to happen because mankind as a whole has rejected Him and doesnt want His help. So because he's allowing us to have our free will, he cant, because of his own promise to let us have our free will, help us unless we ask him to. (In a previous Post I said I believe wha tI believe because of my experience, well this is where that experience comes in, because I asked him to help.)
So really, its not God that "built in those design flaws" but rather our rejection of him that has allowed satan to pervert and corrupt our species.
In the bible Jesus said "Satan has come to steal, kill and destroy, but I have come to give you life and life more abundantly"
*Side note 2*Why was the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden in the Firts place then? I can see this question coming.
Here is what top bible scholars agree on, based on years of research and study of the scripture and other writings that come out of the Hebrew and Jewish culture:
-Lucifer used to be Gods head angel, sorta like a general in the Army. God had implaced a hierarchy and one of the places that the angel Lucifer was overseer of was our prehistoric earth
-Lucifer thought "I could be god" and convinced 1/3 of all the angels of the time to follow him in dethroning God (which was stupid)
-God said "no" and booted him and his 1/3 of angles outta heaven.
-Lucifer made the accusation to all creation that "God is not fair"
-God said "alright then lets have a test then" So he reshaped the earth(which is the chapter 1 of the Book of genesis in the bible) and created this new version of man.
-God puts two specific trees in the garden, The tree of Life and the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the second of which God tells these new people to not eat the fruit of.
So in summary, the tree was there as a test of free will. Because Lucifer made the "not fair" accusation god said "alright Ill make this new creature able to choose me or not me."
Quote: |
--------------------------------------
As for the War and God issue, God doesnt want war. He will protect his people during war, and even in Bible times, he helped his people win Wars and even told them to eradicate certain nations because of their continuing threat to his chosen people. But no where does it say that God wants anyone to go to war. It is mans own sin that brings about war.
--------------------------------------
That's just the sort of comment that really bothers non-religious people. What sort of crazy entity are we dealing with if this statement is correct? |
my point was this and I dont think I was clear the first time, sorry, currenty God's people are the Jews, AND anyone else who calls on his name and confesses him (Jesus) as their saviour. When an entire nation believed on him, as the people of Isreal did in old testament times, other nations, under the influence of satan, would rise up to destroy them, and God would help them win those battles. Now here's where it gets interesting. Remember I mentioned the 1/3 angelic population that got cast out of heaven? Well, Genesis 6, in the bible, talks about the fallen angels coming down to earth and taking human women for wives, which created new races of people. These were the giants (where Goliath, from the story of David and Goliath descended from) and other nations that were meant by Satan to destroy the people of Isreal before the Messiah could come. God had the Isrealites eradicate them because their origin was demonic. Satan had a number of plans to undermine the Messiah(the christ) which brings me to:
Quote: |
What about the legend of Attis? The guy is born to a virgin mother, died to save his people, resurrected and was considered God. He predates Jesus by a 1000 years i believe.
What about Krishna (sounds so much like Christ), Born to a virgin mother, father a carpenter, escaped the slaughter of innocents, went on performing miracles (guess what miracles) . Was crucified on a tree (according to some traditions), resurrected and was considered God. These tails predate Jesus as well.
Were there multiple christs? Is the bible wrong? |
If you have a counterfiet $20 bill, the only thing that makes it a counterfiet is that there was an original. The same principal applies here, Early on in Hebrew History(the time of Abraham, which predates all of the virgin mother/messiah stories), God told his people that he would send a messiah(the christ). He even told them the details that he would be born of a virgin and the "acting" father would be a carpenter, and he would be born a nazarine (a sect of Jews) and that he would be born in bethlehem, Crucified and risen again etc. Well, this was well documented as the Prophets would write it down and it would be passed on through generations. So Lucifer (Satan) had to counter this. So he tried to do the same thing, create counterfiets, to disqualify the true messiah when he came. But the Hebrews had record of the coming messiah beforehand, which brings me to:
Quote: |
-------------------------------
Jewish Culture, since its beginning, has always had a strong strict belief in accuracy. When they were copying the texts, they did it entirely by hand, and if a mistake had been made in the previous text and then corrected, they would duplicate the mistake as well as the correction right down to the spacing between the letters, to not allow for any changes whatsoever.
-------------------------------
Do you understand that this sentence implies that mistakes are not made, -and- then points out that mistakes are corrected? |
sorry, I was wrong on this, here is what I should have said. my apologies for the confusion
The original writer/prophet/whoever would write down whatever he or she was recieving from God. Then, in the next generation of people, they would re-write what was written to the exact letter, down to the spacing of the letters. If they made a mistake, in the copying process, they would throw away the page they were on and start all over again and do that again and again until it was correct. again, my apologies, I was incorrect on stating that they would "copy mistakes" Ive come to understand their copying traditions a little better since the last time I posted.
This reply took me two hours to type out and research and cross reference. :p I hope it clears up some of the muddy things I stated earlier and some of the misconceptions about the christian way of thinking.
by the way Sumaleth, your comment indicates that people who believe in God or some sort of religious ways are not rational thinkiers. Thats a pretty closed minded statement dont you think? come on man, try to think outside your box.  |
|
Back to top |
|
Matthew member
Member # Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 3784 Location: I am out of here for good
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:51 am |
|
 |
And I was so sure I have read that in the Bible, I mean about the Dragon part. I am reading in the swedish Bible here right now but I can�t find it, maybe was another version or something, I will have to check that thing out...hehe, maybe it was a children version of the Bible...hehe.
Matthew |
|
Back to top |
|
Drew member
Member # Joined: 14 Jan 2002 Posts: 495 Location: Atlanta, GA, US
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:41 am |
|
 |
I say we should be born with knowlege of God, you say that we were, "we" meaning my ancestors Adam and Eve.
Dude, I have no fricking clue about anything that they thought or did, or if they even existed, yet I'm told be held accountable for their actions? And what I'm given to figure this out is a really old crazy ass book that not everyone gets to see while they live and that I may or may not read because I'm busy and stuff? And if I don't happen to get the book, study it for years, and figure out that God is real, then I'm sent to burn in a place of unimaginable pain for an amount of time that is so long that it can't even be defined?
Not only does that not seem like good plan devised by a being of infinite wisdom, it seems ludicrous. Why would God allow this to happen?
Quote: |
Here is what top bible scholars agree on, based on years of research and study of the scripture and other writings that come out of the Hebrew and Jewish culture: |
If NOVA can explain to me genetics and quantum physics in less than an hour, why in the world would God just give me a rule book that had to go through all this to be explained?
Quote: |
If the Bible is true, then God doesnt create bad things, but allows bad things to happen because mankind as a whole has rejected Him and doesnt want His help. |
I couldn't have rejected God because I never "had" him. If the bible is true, I'm being held personally responsible for the actions of an angel and a couple of dumbasses. All three of which God designed, BTW. If he didn't want us to not believe, why bother with giving us a choice?
Edit:
Quote: |
God said "alright then lets have a test then" So he reshaped the earth(which is the chapter 1 of the Book of genesis in the bible) and created this new version of man. |
THIS is why I stand a chance of burning in hell? Why doesn't he just bet on dograces or something if he's bored? Besides, since he's all knowing and all seeing [b]he already knows the outcome[b]. That doesn't add up.
Also, I'd like to hear your opinion about Mormons, who've added to the bible. As an athiest, I find their additions just as true as the New Testament. Prove me wrong.
Quote: |
If you have a counterfiet $20 bill, the only thing that makes it a counterfiet is that there was an original. |
He's not claiming that they're counterfeits, merely that they're fakes. And just because I buy some magic beans and find that they don't work doesn't mean that somewhere out there are real magic beans.
As for Religious people being rational thinkers...they may be most of the time. But what faith comes down to is just faith, and there's nothing rational about that. |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 10:38 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
The Bible says in genesis 1:28 "God said unto them(Adam and Eve) be fruitful and multiply, and REplenish(repopulate) the earth..."
|
Your two hours of research must have missed the fact that:
. The word "replenish" at the time the bible was translated from hebrew to english most likely meant "fill".
. The word in the original text is the hebrew word for "fill".
. The same word is used several hundred times in the original hebrew text and the majorify of them were translated as "fill".
This is one of the (many) reasons I have trouble believing the bible - so much of it is about interpretation, and everyone seems to interpret it in a way that best fits what they want.
There might be a majority of people in the world who follow religion, but given that all religions are at odds with each other (or they'd be the same religion), there's not going to be many people left who are right. Of course, everyone thinks theirs is the right one. You have to know how that looks.
Quote: |
If he (Satan) could plant seeds of doubt in the First man he could gain access to planting confusion in all mankind after that.
|
So let me get this straight. God created two people and set them lose with "free will" (which is really only semi-free-will given that most of our behavior is directed by instinct), but then he was surprised when these people he designed were so easily tricked by satan?
Quote: |
Matthew, the bible does not say that Adam and Eve were created with Dragons Blood... and that has to be the first time Ive ever heard that.
|
The bible might not say that, but it'd be cool, huh?
Quote: |
So really, its not God that "built in those design flaws" but rather our rejection of him that has allowed satan to pervert and corrupt our species.
|
Whoa! So you're saying that my hayfever/asthma/short-sightedness is the result of Satan playing around with mankind, and God lets Satan do this sort of thing because... well I didn't quite catch the "why". It's because God is annoyed that the first two people he created didn't do what he wanted?
Quote: |
So he tried to do the same thing, create counterfiets, to disqualify the true messiah when he came.
|
Better hope that Jesus wasn't a counterfeit.
Quote: |
Why was the tree of knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden in the Firts place then? I can see this question coming.
|
These stories are just so easy to mock, and I don't do it just to be nasty, it's just that they are so clearly alegorical and yet so many people read them as though they are true accounts of events that happened exactly as described.
I mean, if I said that the story of Rumplestiltskin was true, exactly as the story is told? You'd look at me a bit funny wouldn't you?
The story may well have had its seed in a true event, but it was shaped by the point of view of the writer, the culture of the time, and the writer's own storytelling skills. You'll never know how much of the original, true story remains in the final work.
To me, this is what the bible reads like. It reads like a piece of storytelling.
Quote: |
by the way Sumaleth, your comment indicates that people who believe in God or some sort of religious ways are not rational thinkiers. Thats a pretty closed minded statement dont you think? come on man, try to think outside your box.
|
I was referring to the actual definition of the term, not the contemporary variation that has the negative connotations.
Religious people believe in a universe which isn't necessarily systematic. God can create an event that has no basis in casuality - it just happens. That's an irrational universe. _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials |
|
Back to top |
|
Awetopsy member
Member # Joined: 04 Oct 2000 Posts: 3028 Location: Kelowna
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 10:51 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
Dude, I have no fricking clue about anything that they thought or did, or if they even existed, yet I'm told be held accountable for their actions? And what I'm given to figure this out is a really old crazy ass book that not everyone gets to see while they live and that I may or may not read because I'm busy and stuff? And if I don't happen to get the book, study it for years, and figure out that God is real, then I'm sent to burn in a place of unimaginable pain for an amount of time that is so long that it can't even be defined? |
Who said you are being held accountable for thier actions? They are being held accountable for their actions, you will be held accountable for yours. Their choices affected you and I, but you are not responsible for them, nowhere does it say that.
And whoever said anything about hell? Its not my place to say whether you are going to hell... never was, thats something thats between you and God, not me.
The point is, Jesus died and went to hell, so you wouldnt have to. He then was raised from the dead and ascended back into heaven to prepare a place for all those who believed on him.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever would believe on him would not perish(the original language here means "be separated from him eternally") but have everlasting life.
DO you have to believe it? No.
Quote: |
I couldn't have rejected God because I never "had" him. If the bible is true, I'm being held personally responsible for the actions of an angel and a couple of dumbasses. All three of which God designed, BTW. If he didn't want us to not believe, why bother with giving us a choice? |
Did you actually read my whole reply? God gave us a choice because he wouldnt be a fair God if he didnt.
If God is all powerful, he can do anything, that means he can choose not to know what each of us are going to choose.
as for the mormons. Deuteronomy 4:2 says �Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.�
and again, as per religious rational thinkers, How can you say Faith isnt rational when you havent experienced it? Who makes you the authority?
Do you even know what faith is according to a chirstian?
thre are a number of different definitions for Faith in the world.
The christian definition of Faith is:
Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
An example of this is when a mother tells her child that she will give him a cookie in five minutes. Does that child walk away and say, moms never gonna give me that cookie? No. He stands there and waits with his hand stretched out expectantly for five minutes until his mother gives him a cookie.
This is exactly how christians see their faith. Is that Irrational?
[edited my thing about faith a little to be clear] |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:07 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
�Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.�
|
The bible wasn't written by one person as far as I understand it. There were quite a number of people who 'god spoke to' and they wrote what he said, and then all these stories were later compiled into the "bible". Thats about how it goes, right?
So my question is this: how do we know which writings are the real deal?
There are people all over the world every year who believe god speaks to them, and they write it down. Why are these writings not included in the bible canon?
And why did god tell the muslims a different story? (don't answer that one, I know it was "satan" ) _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials
Last edited by Sumaleth on Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:18 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
klaivu member
Member # Joined: 29 Jan 2000 Posts: 551 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:15 am |
|
 |
I have to second Suma.
And I have to say I like the not-so-in-flames tone of this discussion.
Some thoughts about christianity :
Like Suma explained, there might be a " root system ", or multiple of them, or we could all be just plugged to the matrix for all we know, but that doesn't make any specific view in contradiction of empiric knowledge any more valid than the other. Still many use this possibility as a way to back up their views. The possibility of a god outside the logic of this system doesn't make christianity valid.
Instead of going to the details and inner logic of christianity, what is there to prove it's validity ? Why would the bible be true ?
( It would be cool to be a god. More to manage than in MOO3. ) |
|
Back to top |
|
Awetopsy member
Member # Joined: 04 Oct 2000 Posts: 3028 Location: Kelowna
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:20 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
The word "replenish" at the time the bible was translated from hebrew to english most likely meant "fill".
. The word in the original text is the hebrew word for "fill".
. The same word is used several hundred times in the original hebrew text and the majorify of them were translated as "fill". |
You're partly right, the original Hebrew word is "alm" and is used 7 times as "replenish". Also the words around it carried on them connotation which would direct the way the word "alm" was being used. Its all about the context its in.
AS per the rest, what makes these stories allegorical? |
|
Back to top |
|
Drew member
Member # Joined: 14 Jan 2002 Posts: 495 Location: Atlanta, GA, US
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 5:45 pm |
|
 |
Quote: |
well, If the bible is true and the story of Adam and Eve and the garden of eden really did exist, then Mankind originally was created with "the truth". But since the angel Lucifer fell from heaven and became the "father of lies"(Satan) He, Satan, had to throw confusion into the mix to make Adam and Eve second guess God. If he could plant seeds of doubt in the First man he could gain access to planting confusion in all mankind after that.
|
If that's how it is in the bible, then the bible is saying that I'm being held accountable for their actions. Because of their choice to eat the fruit, I stand a chance of going to hell. I already spoke about how unlikely it is for me to become Christian since I've no inclination to spend years studying the bible and don't spiritually feel that there must be a God. And the fact is, since I'm atheist, if I die right now and I'm wrong then I burn.
Quote: |
John 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, that whosoever would believe on him would not perish(the original language here means "be separated from him eternally") but have everlasting life.
DO you have to believe it? No. |
I'm not sure what you mean with that last sentence. Are you saying that I don't have to believe the bible, or that even if I don't believe I will still go to heaven?
I did indeed read your whole reply. I contend that if God exists, then you're getting a better chance of going to heaven that I am because of whatever experience you went through that helped you believe. Where is the fairness in that? What is fair about creating this situation (earth, people, satan, etc)? Perhaps I was given a choice, but it's impossible to study all the religions of the world for years at a time. Why would God put us in such a postion if he is so kind and wise?
A child will stand and wait for a cookie from his mother because she feeds him on a regular basis. It is rational because it is in line with what the child knows about his mother. A child may also be fooled into standing in the woods waiting for a cookie to fall from the sky. Is that rational? No, and the child will eventually figure that out, and by the time he is grown he will be wise enough to be skepitcal of things that do not fit within his world view.
That's not to say he will be closed minded, just that anything that doesn't fit with what he knows must be proven. But if a 2000 year old text claimed cookies would be handed out in five minutes, would you stand with arms outstretched? You would if you had faith, which, in the Christian sense, is unchanging belief without total proof of the fact. It is not "evidence of things not seen." Evidence suggests proof, and apparently your belief does not prove God existance to others. |
|
Back to top |
|
Drunken Monkey member
Member # Joined: 08 Feb 2000 Posts: 1016 Location: mothership
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:45 pm |
|
 |
To Awetopsy:
Hmm, interesting, I can see where your argument makes sense. But out of around 300 (or close) predictions in the pre New Testament bible, do any of them actually nail any details? I found the �Riding in on a Donkey� and �Born of Virgin Mother� � I can�t find anything but very vague and general descriptions besides those. In the �Born of Virgin� they didn�t predict the name properly
Quote: |
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a
virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name
Immanuel.
Isaiah 7:14 (KJV) |
I can�t find the key details that would enable the story of Krishna (and others) to be a copy� for instance:
1. Born of Carpenter, and is himself a carpenter.
2. Crucified. (Between two thieves � this also can be found about Krishna in certain traditions.)
3. Kishna, Buddha and Attis were all born on dec 25th � just like Jesus.
4. Buddha walked on water, fed hundreds from a single basket of food. Was resurrected, as his coverings were unrolled from his body and his tomb was opened by supernatural powers. Both Buddha and Jesus mention �Inner Buddha� and �Inner Christ�.
There is even an number of parallel sayings between Jesus and Buddha.. for instance:
Jesus: "Do to others as you would have them do to you." Luke 6:31
Buddha: "Consider others as yourself." Dhammapada 10:1
Are you saying all these stolen from Old Testament?
P.S.
I remember when I was younger I looked for historical evidence of Jesus � there seems to be no shred of proof. Anywhere. For such a prominent figure � followed by thousands all over the land, performing incredible miracles this is surprising. There are some shreds here and there but they have all been identified and dismissed as doctored records � changed by Christians to better suit their agenda. Any thoughts on this? I guess you could say the evidence was taken out by <insert your favorite supernatural villain here>. You could make the ultimate argument and say that Satan went back in time and planted false evidence all over the place � including some bits and shreds in ancient Mexico� _________________ "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" - Sigmund Freud |
|
Back to top |
|
BlueFlamez junior member
Member # Joined: 13 Oct 2001 Posts: 1 Location: S'pore
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:23 pm |
|
 |
i would wish to sit with life after death, and the energy concept. here just to share something interesting from my view. Our energy life, i belief, exist in an invisible form to us, just as we are blind to UV(e.g bees can see UV though but bees can't see color red) but able to see all colours. Lending weight to this is the momentum concept, which is something we can't see also. If a moving ball (with momemtum) collides with another stationary ball, the momentum gets passed on, moving the stationary ball. Life energy is akin to momentum and our physical self is akin to the ball. So our current form as a being is only one part of a possible chain of forms we can take in other dimensions. Momemtum is the vehicle of the lifeforce to transit between the dimensions e.g. life after death in another life...the momentum version of lifeforce might be binded by what is the schrodinger law ... _________________ Humility is the prerogative of humanity |
|
Back to top |
|
SolarC member
Member # Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 274 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2003 9:21 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
Quote: |
But these things are mostly questions of if there is something byeond this universe. Science is tied into this material universe we live in. I'm not ofcourse saying that peoples faith could prove spiritual things as science proves things in material world.
|
Ah yes, I think this is a good example of the reason the age old debate of science vs religion never, ever gets anywhere.
The "theist" version of God - that is, the religious version - is above science, meaning that god it not at all confined by what the limits of what science might be able to explain.
This means that religious people have an overriding belief that regardless of what science is able to work out, there will always be things that it simply does not have access to.
I guess this is a belief in an "irrational" universe. That the universe might appear rational to some degree, but the underlying system is not confined to rational behavior.
On the other hand, people who follow science have an overriding belief in a "rational" universe. They believe that because the universe - to date - has turned out to be remarkably systematic that it's highly likely that is ALL based on a system.
The scientists say things like: "Theism is based on a lot of irrational assumptions/beliefs." |
To avoid misunderstandings as a repeat of what I said before. I am an agnostic what goes to rational thinking and that is the side I much base my view of the world on. However I don't want to rule out the possiblities of things that are out of reach of science and my faith in chance that there might be some kind of afterlife is based on my experience with things which I do realise doesn't prove anything. I'm doing my spiritual research which needs different type of approach than matters of science. Mostly because the answers found by what I call spiritual practise are not absolute answers. So what I'm trying to tell you is that in my view spiritualism and science doesn't collide. What collides is some peoples belief that there isn't anything beyond what science can prove or atleast what are logical conclusions basing on scientific proof. I see this as only possibility how things might be. I'm not sure if this belief of mine can be considered theistic. I understand this concept is probably pretty hard thing to understand for most religious and atheist people. I don't concider myself that this view of the world would be any irrational despite the fact that there aren't scientific proof to back up my belief. That's why my belief isn't the absolute truth for me. All I have is assumptions based only on experiences.
Quote: |
My take is that the irrational side of the argument stems from the
evolutionary process.
We like to think of ourselves as special because we have "freedom of
choice". But the truth is that we don't really have FULL freedom of
choice. The majority of our behavior is still controlled by instinct, and
instinct is an artifact of evolution. And evolution is neither perfect nor
necessarily "right" -- it's whatever we needed to survive another
generation.
But I base that on rational thinking, which is of course pointless.  |
I'm not saying rational thinking is pointless. I just think that your view of the world, although it is based on rational assumptions about evolution theory, hasn't been scientificly proved any more right than my belief that there might be something more. Yes it might be the most logical assumption to think your way according to western scientific anthropology and current information available. Would it be an absolute truth, that can't be proved.
I myself base my view of the world quite much on science. So I don't think I could believe in something which is overruled by scientificly holding evidence. So what I'm trying to say is that I don't feel that beliving in a possibility of something that can not be valuated with scientificly competent measurements is necesserily irrational. Believing in something which can be proved against with science is.
Hope this opens up the issue a little bit.
edit: Let me add. I'm after a lot of other things too with my spiritual practise than only finding out answers to questions about afterlife etc. The experiences are very valuable to me despite the fact that they probably don't get me any more certain about these issues as I am now. I have learned a lot about myself because of them. I also have some practical purposes of my practise. Like I feel that the goal of breaking ego found in yoga philosophy is very healthy and the practise of it certainly has increased my happyness and has made possible for me to see things in my life in more right proportions. |
|
Back to top |
|
SolarC member
Member # Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 274 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2003 10:02 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
Like Suma explained, there might be a " root system ", or multiple of them, or we could all be just plugged to the matrix for all we know, but that doesn't make any specific view in contradiction of empiric knowledge any more valid than the other. Still many use this possibility as a way to back up their views. The possibility of a god outside the logic of this system doesn't make christianity valid. |
I don't know if this was an answer for me, despite the mentioning of "matrix philosophy". I'll decided to answer just in case.
I'm not believing that there would certainly be afterlife and I'm definitely not a christian by belief. I'm only believing in a possibility of some things that can't be proved. Like afterlife. This is not in the contradiction with scientific evidence. How rational it is is pretty much bound on to the viewpoint of how to evaluate things. As I said before I look at this thing from a different angle than what western scientific anthropology keeps orthodox. |
|
Back to top |
|
Atrophy member
Member # Joined: 05 Apr 2003 Posts: 68 Location: Glendale, Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2003 3:04 pm |
|
 |
I find it hard to dicern the validity of a website, when I click on 'afterlife photos' and it's a pornsite.... may just be me. _________________ 'why', is all I hear in my mind,
as I try to stop crying inside, but die trying...
MySite |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2003 10:35 pm |
|
 |
SolarC: Actually, what you say there pretty much matches my stance too.
--
So lets see - there seem to be 3 models of the way the universe works:
1/ The universe was created by natural means.
2/ The universe was created by a god in the religious sense.
3/ The universe was created by a god who doesn't fit the religious definition.
And due to the nature (not a pun) of the question, there is NO way for mankind to know the correct answer.
Science can never be 100% certain. Science doesn't work that way. Science could end up finding rational, systematic explanations for everything that we experience, but it could still be said that it still doesn't rule out the possibility of god.
The god option, on the other hand, will always remain open to the possibility of being proven - although the -only- way for this to happen would be for god to say hello to everyone. Which is something she doesn't seem keen to do.
Now while there are people who are "fairly-to-very certain" that the universe has natural origins, there are people who "KNOW" that god exists. There are many people who say that god has made her presence clear to them. You don't get that in science, so that's an interesting difference.
Of course, the people who don't get a tap on the shoulder from the big G are left to wonder whether all these other people are collectively crazy, or whether there is some organic explanation.
Which returns me to my first points: even if science does manage to explain it, it'll never be a 100% explanation, and the people who have had such experiences will still KNOW that god exists.
--
I've been on the internet for about 10 years, and the ol' "god question" comes up about.. ooh.. about 5 times a year. So that's about 50 times I've been involved in or witnessed such discussion---
---and I have -never- seen anyone change their opinion as a result of the arguments made. Never.
My point being - this is not a debate that can go anywhere.
It's either going to take huge advances in science and thousands of years before the evolutionary instinct we call "god" gets diluted out of our system.
OR, it's going to take a "hey howdy hey" from the big G before religion becomes a unifying belief.
I don't expect either to happen in my lifetime. But who knows?
--
And just to prove that I can type as much drivel as anyone, here's a little bit of logical thinking that interests me:
We know that the universe is at -least- partially systematic (from our point of view).
Take the human body for example - it's not an arbitrary avatarial form, it's a complex living system with thousands of shortcomings and millions of ways to break down. And the closer we look, the more we realize that we -can- understand how it works. And with this understanding we come to find aspects of its design that are of no use to us and that are less than perfectly designed.
Likewise, the planet has been clearly created and molded by an ongoing system. And matter itself is a cute little system of atoms, sub-atomic particles, and virbrating strings (or whatever they turn out to be).
There are -many- things in our universe that we can readily state are created/managed by systems.
So, the question is: if god is real, then did god create these systems, or are they merely an illusion?
If god did create them, then we have to assume that she knowingly designed flaws into the human body. And we also have to assume that she would know that we would eventually find all these systems and understand how they work.
If they're illusory, then we have to assume that god is toying with us.
I can't think of any good reason why I should believe the systems are illusory. Our growing understanding of these systems has too readily lead to predictions that were later be shown to be true, and to ways that we can interfere or interact with these systems to make our lives better.
Which means that for me to believe that god exists, I have to accept that:
. She knowingly designed flawed systems.
. That she knows we will find these systems.
. That these systems will appear to be of natural origin.
. And that these systems will contradict religious beliefs.
But that is not the god of religion. _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials |
|
Back to top |
|
spooge demon member
Member # Joined: 15 Nov 1999 Posts: 1475 Location: Haiku, HI, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 3:54 am |
|
 |
sumaleth, assuming they are flaws presupposes that you know the true function of a system, if it was in fact designed. I am not the tree, I am but a leaf, and meant to die. So that funny looking mole on my butt is all part of God's Plan:)
My bubblegum card philosophy for the day: complexity is relative. The universe seems very large and complex to anyone who has taken a look. Many use this perception to conclude one thing or another. Is it that complex or are we just very tiny and dumb? We have no other frame of reference to know.
back to wwwork |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 4:41 am |
|
 |
spooge demon wrote: |
sumaleth, assuming they are flaws presupposes that you know the true function of a system, if it was in fact designed. I am not the tree, I am but a leaf, and meant to die. So that funny looking mole on my butt is all part of God's Plan:)
|
That's true, although I'm really only using the term "flaw" as a denigrating way of saying "I think the design is less than perfect".
--
Of course, what you're really saying is that maybe our pain and suffering serves some higher purpose. A purpose that we're not in on.
Well that sounds like slavery to me.
Although, now you mention it, the bible doesn't consider slavery a moral crime.
--
What if our pain and suffering now benefits us later - maybe in that "afterlife" that started this thread?
If god designed the system this way, I return to one of my earlier comments:
"Yeah, good effort." _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials |
|
Back to top |
|
Awetopsy member
Member # Joined: 04 Oct 2000 Posts: 3028 Location: Kelowna
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 6:29 pm |
|
 |
Ive really enjoyed this conversation so far. Although it seems as tho some people are getting defensive.. and so Im not going to go on about greek and hebrew anymore.
I always find it very interesting to hear other peoples thought and beliefs and love to share mine if anyone wants to listen.
Ive been carefully considering my responses and I freely admit, Im certainly no scholar on the bible or religious beliefs, but I always find religious beliefs fascinating.
Instead of continuing about whether the bible is accurate, or whether Krishna is a fake, or whatever, Im going to share with you some experience Ive had just this weekend.
I am the youth leader at my church. I have been for the last four years. This weekend we held a youth and young adult convention, got a local band and a couple guest speakers from nearby cities. One of the guest speakers brought a number of his youth group along and I had a chance to speak with some of them. Id like to share a one of their stories.
I spoke to an 18 year old named Johnny, a skater, wears his hat crooked and sideways on his head, wears baggy jeans and says "dude" alot. About a year ago his dad developed a heart problem and Johnny got scared, so in desperation, he said "God, you cant let my dad die. Its not his time and I still need him." His dad got better. No more problems with his heart.
A week ago, Johnny was praying with a friend and all of a sudden saw an image, in his mind, of a man with a beard with a green flannel jacket and blue jeans.. looking sorta like a bum, someone he had never even seen before. A couple of days went by and again, on a sunday morning, when he was praying saw the same image of that same guy. His sister called him to ask him to pick her up for church and so he had to leave a bit earlier, so after he had picked up his sister, they started towards church and were driving down past a gas station and he happened to look over his shoulder and saw the man with the beard, with a green flannel jacket and blue jeans riding a bike, so he quickly turned a street and pulled into a gas station and said "God, If he comes down this street, Ill go talk to him." Well, the man in the green flannel jacket turned down that street, so Johnny flagged him down and said "Sir, I really feel like God is telling me that you need to go to church". The guy just looked at him kinda funny, and then asked him for a quarter to make a phone call. So Johnny gave him a quarter and a card for his church and then left the man and continued to church. During the church service, he remembered that he hadnt told the man when church started, so he said, "God, I know I forgot to tell the man when church started, so let me see him again today or tomorrow and Ill tell him what time church starts." Later that day, Johnny and a buddy were driving somewhere and again he saw the man in the green flannel jacket, so he pulled over and went up to the man and said, "Sir, I forgot to tell you when church started. The man said,"Yes you did." Johnny then told him what time church started (for a midweek evening service) and the guy looked at him and said "Ill check my schedule" and turned away. Johnny reached out his hand and put it on the mans shoulder and said "Sir, I really do feel like God is saying to you that you should go to church" The man just stopped and said, "Man you're giving me goose bumps". He then said to Johnny, "I just recently arrived in town here from Vancouver, My mom passed away and before she died, she told me she was praying for me to get into a good church. I didnt want to think about it." This was last week, so we'll have to see if the guy shows up in church. Sometimes, God might call, but people dont answer.
Here's something that happened at the youth and young adult conference my church held, one of the guest speakers at the end of his message, asked people who wanted something from God to come up to the front and he would pray for them, one of the guys that went to the front was a good friend of mine named David Wylie. The guest speaker looked at him and said, "God says you are a watcher on the wall, you see things before anyone else and warning other people about them." (I was standing two feet from this since I was the MC for the night) The speaker went on to tell him that God was going to open up his eyes to be able to see more and to get more information.
David Wylie is a journalist for one of the biggest news publications in Vancouver B.C. Canada. His job is to get news before other people He lives in my home town of Kelowna and reports for the publication which is out of Vancouver(4 hours drive away). The guest speaker never met David before, and I know this because I know both the speaker and David.
These are the real reasons I believe what I do. I see this kind of thing all the time. I could go on typing up all the different things Ive seen "the big G" do.
whether you believe me or not, these things do happen, every day.
[couple of edits for clarity] |
|
Back to top |
|
Drunken Monkey member
Member # Joined: 08 Feb 2000 Posts: 1016 Location: mothership
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:31 pm |
|
 |
:]
Maybe what you think god is � he/she/it isn�t. Maybe what you think are imperfections is really something that serves its purpose perfectly.
As I observed it so far there is an obvious interaction of positive and negative, light and dark, love and fear, gravity and repulsion manifesting everywhere. That interaction of opposites seems to have one thing in common � it cycles the energy. The same primal energy released at the moment of BIG BANG. Whatever form it may take at the moment � purely physical or a thinner emotional, spiritual if you will. I cannot find any other purpose for the existence of the universe other than that constant cycling and interaction on all imaginable levels. Yes it�s as if God is experiencing everything that is possible to experience � all good, bad and all that�s in the middle - if you want to think of it that way.
For example for the world to exist there have to be two opposite forces present � gravity and repulsion. Pick one and take its side. Repulsion thinks its 100% abundance is the perfection, gravity thinks in inverse. What do you have when one of them is absent? Nothing. So there is a balance of the two which enables the world to exist.
I�d like to know what great plans some of you who think the world �could be better� have in mind. _________________ "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" - Sigmund Freud |
|
Back to top |
|
Drunken Monkey member
Member # Joined: 08 Feb 2000 Posts: 1016 Location: mothership
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 7:46 pm |
|
 |
I think most of us have these stories... i too have no explanation for them... these things happening keep me thinking that there is a force out there listening, helping. Ever since i decided that i am no longer a christian nothing changed. _________________ "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" - Sigmund Freud |
|
Back to top |
|
Sumaleth Administrator
Member # Joined: 30 Oct 1999 Posts: 2898 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2003 9:01 pm |
|
 |
These sorts of stories do seem to have a very strong impact on people who already believe god exists.
But they have no impact on people who aren't already tuned to that sort of thinking.
It's related to what I said earlier about the rational/irrational way of looking at the universe.
--
Here's a little story to show what I mean (this is made up):
Two (unconnected) people buy lottery tickets.
One guy is currently writing a book about evolution. He's been trying to finish it for 2 years. But he doesnt have enough money saved to work on it full time, so he has to keep taking freelance jobs which keep him away from the one project he truely loves. This guy buys a lottery ticket, week after week, on the odd chance he might get lucky.
The other guy is the Pastor of a local church. His church is located in the poorest suburb of the city, and even though the church has only just enough funds to stay open another week or two, he can't bring himself to ask for more money from his church members because he knows they have already contributed more than they can afford. He prays nightly for god to help his church. He has never bought a lottery ticket before, but 3 days before the church closes down he decides to buy a ticket so that god has a "way" of giving him help.
The writer wins $2million! He can't believe his luck.
The pastor wins $2million! He won't ever stop thanking god.
Some time later these two guys happen to meet, and in casual conversation they tell each other their stories.
The writer thinks that the pastor's win was by chance, even if the pastor won't admit it.
The pastor thinks that the writer's win was from god, even if the writer won't admit it.
--
Stories are nice, but they will only ever reinforce the way the person already thinks (and make them wonder why the other person is seeing something in the story that clearly isnt there). _________________ Art Links Archive -- Artists and Tutorials |
|
Back to top |
|
Matthew member
Member # Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 3784 Location: I am out of here for good
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:27 am |
|
 |
It all comes down to Coincidence cause I don�t believe in Faith. Should be the only thing that works for 100% and that is coincidence, all these random things that happens all the time. Either you have luck and neither you don�t, either you rich neither you�re not, either you are clever neither you are not.
The truth is out there and I want to believe in Aliens and all sort of mysterious things, but it�s very hard and so far nothing has gone my way so I will still live in doubt of a higher thing and that -that higher thing will help us on the way.
What about Nietsche�s point of view, God is dead?
Matthew |
|
Back to top |
|
Drew member
Member # Joined: 14 Jan 2002 Posts: 495 Location: Atlanta, GA, US
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 9:24 am |
|
 |
Awetopsy, your story makes me feel like I'm watching that show on Sci-Fi with the guy who talks to dead people. Just because you or I can't explain something doesn't make it the work of God. Those of us who look for patterns in life are bound to find them. Why do you think so many people have conspiracy theories?
Spooge is right on, though. We are small and know nothing. However, that is no reason to give up reason. All we can do is do the best we can at understanding the world around us. |
|
Back to top |
|
Dr. Bang member
Member # Joined: 04 Dec 2001 Posts: 1425 Location: DENHAAG, HOLLAND
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 12:52 pm |
|
 |
Sumaleth wrote: |
These sorts of stories do seem to have a very strong impact on people who already believe god exists.
But they have no impact on people who aren't already tuned to that sort of thinking.
It's related to what I said earlier about the rational/irrational way of looking at the universe.
--
Here's a little story to show what I mean (this is made up):
Two (unconnected) people buy lottery tickets.
One guy is currently writing a book about evolution. He's been trying to finish it for 2 years. But he doesnt have enough money saved to work on it full time, so he has to keep taking freelance jobs which keep him away from the one project he truely loves. This guy buys a lottery ticket, week after week, on the odd chance he might get lucky.
The other guy is the Pastor of a local church. His church is located in the poorest suburb of the city, and even though the church has only just enough funds to stay open another week or two, he can't bring himself to ask for more money from his church members because he knows they have already contributed more than they can afford. He prays nightly for god to help his church. He has never bought a lottery ticket before, but 3 days before the church closes down he decides to buy a ticket so that god has a "way" of giving him help.
The writer wins $2million! He can't believe his luck.
The pastor wins $2million! He won't ever stop thanking god.
Some time later these two guys happen to meet, and in casual conversation they tell each other their stories.
The writer thinks that the pastor's win was by chance, even if the pastor won't admit it.
The pastor thinks that the writer's win was from god, even if the writer won't admit it.
--
Stories are nice, but they will only ever reinforce the way the person already thinks (and make them wonder why the other person is seeing something in the story that clearly isnt there). |
Strange, because i dont believe god......etc exist at ALL. But every time somthing lucky happens to me, the first thing that come to my head is god. I choose to do the right path so i dont get into trouble and because of god.
But i dont believe in god. _________________ Join Roundeye's secret art forum. SHHHHHHHHHHH! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2005 phpBB Group
|